folo

folo header image 2

“Immature jerk” doesn’t quite cover it

October 7th, 2008 @ 9:26 am - by lotus · 5 Comments

The other day, after I referred to John McCain and Sarah Palin as “immature jerk[s],” NMC fretted off-blog about that language, suggesting it could alienate some readers. Well. Read Dana Milbank’s account of what Sarah Palin and her crazed followers said and did yesterday in Florida, and then tell me “immature jerk” is over the line. I hereby up the bid to “fascist maniac.”

You foloers who care about the Republican Party — hadn’t you better get on the phone to your highest-placed party contacts and demand that they get McCain-Palin straightened-up before they completely ruin you all?

Filed Under: Herald & Examiner

5 Responses so far ↓

  1. GlitterGirl says:

    I hope those heels are the pointed toe type-she’s gonna need ‘em to kill the roaches she’ll be bringing out with all of this garbage.

  2. lotus says:

    Andrew Sullivan gets the picture too.

    But . . . um . . . Steve Schmidt missed something.

  3. NMC says:

    Actually, the line is this: Show don’t tell.

    Telling someone that a public figure is an immature jerk is a waste of breath. Demonstrating it so the reader thinks to themselves “what an immature jerk” means you’ve convinced someone. I don’t think “telling” advances the conversation much but “showing” does.

  4. lotus says:

    NMC, consider then WaPo’s and comment #2’s showings.

  5. lotus says:

    TPM’s Greg Sargent just talked to Dana Milbank, who says:

    “None of this is new, but the degree of intensity is different,” Milbank says. “It’s taken an uglier turn. I’ve been doing this for years, and there’s never been anything quite like this.”

    Milbank says that after the Palin attacked the New York Times and Katie Couric in her stump speech yesterday in Florida, he and other reporters were pelted with boos, with some saying things like “screw you” and “fucking liberal media.”

    “McCain has so overtly taken on the media — they’re doing it to rile the base,” he continued. “And lo and behold, the base is good and riled.”

    The base and its candidates may be “riled,” all right, but no way that “good” applies to any of them.