folo

You’ve no doubt heard or read claims that Barack Obama is secretly a Muslim, radical Islam’s “Manchurian candidate” in U.S. politics. Perhaps you, like I, have wondered how and where those started. Welp, we’re not the only ones. Check out today’s WaPo:

PRINCETON, N.J. – The e-mail landed in Danielle Allen’s queue one winter morning as she was studying in her office at the Institute for Advanced Study, the renowned haven for some of the nation’s most brilliant minds. The missive began: “THIS DEFINITELY WARRANTS LOOKING INTO.”

Laid out before Allen, a razor-sharp, 36-year-old political theorist, was what purported to be a biographical sketch of Barack Obama that has become one of the most effective — and baseless — Internet attacks of the 2008 presidential season. The anonymous chain e-mail makes the false claim that Obama is concealing a radical Islamic background. By the time it reached Allen on Jan. 11, 2008, it had spread with viral efficiency for more than a year.

During that time, polls show the number of voters who mistakenly believe Obama is a Muslim rose — from 8 percent to 13 percent between November 2007 and March 2008. And some cited this religious mis-affiliation when explaining their primary votes against him. …

But long before this, Allen had been obsessing about the origins of her e-mail at the institute, which is most famous for having been the research home of Albert Einstein. Allen studies the way voters in a democracy gather their information and act on what they learn. She was familiar, of course, with the false rumors of a secret love child that helped sink McCain’s White House bid in 2000, and the Swift boat attacks that did the same to Democrat John Kerry in 2004. But the Obama e-mail was on another plane: The use of the Internet made it possible to launch anonymous attacks that could reach millions of voters in weeks or even days. …

Reporter Matthew Mosk explains how Allen discovered and pinpointed a handful of participants on the Free Republic website (“Freepers”) who seemed to be near “ground zero” of the spurious emails.

While Allen was already an expert on the mechanics of politics, she fast began to learn the mechanics of the Internet. She discovered, for instance, that the recipe for launching a chain e-mail attack is not as simple as typing it up and hitting the send button to a long list of recipients. It takes effort to seed a chain mail that spreads as widely as the Obama missive, explained Jeff Bedser, president of the Internet Crimes Group, a company that helps corporations battle such broadsides. “Lighting that fire, getting something to have momentum, takes work,” he said.

For this kind of chain-mail message to gain traction, it must be plausible, and it has to resonate, said Eric Dezenhall, a public relations specialist who once worked in the Reagan White House. Obama was vulnerable, Dezenhall said, because of his unusual name, his childhood in Indonesia, a foreign-born father, and his sudden arrival on the national stage without a fully fleshed-out biography. “All of these things gave it merchandising legs,” Dezenhall said.

Allen found a multi-screenful list recipients of the e-mail about Obama and first tried to learn about “the people behind the addresses.” That approach proving unproductive, next she tried Googling some of the unusual phrases in the e-mail.

Her eyes fell on this untrue sentence: “ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office he DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Kuran (Their equivalency to our Bible, but very different beliefs).”

The use of “their equivalency” and the spelling of “Kuran” instead of “Koran” made the sentence her point of departure. …

Before long Allen pinpointed several Freepers repeatedly using these distinctive phrases, and Mosk was able to track down and interview some of them for this article: all deny having any connection to the emails.

O. Kay.

But maybe you should read Mosk’s story and decide for yourself . . .