folo

folo header image 2

Selected reactions to Dickie’s sentencing

June 28th, 2008 @ 6:24 am - by lotus · 10 Comments

One of my first thoughts as news of Dickie Scruggs’s sentence broke yesterday was, “I wonder how Judge Lackey’s doing today.” Happily, Paul Quinn was able to find out:

Circuit Judge Henry Lackey learned from a friend’s cell phone call Friday what punishment Dickie Scruggs had received for conspiring to bribe him.

“It was relief that this chapter of my life is over,” Lackey said. “Yet, I felt pangs of embarrassment for our state, and embarrassment for our profession.”

Well, Your Honor, since you proved the touchstone for the profession here, I hope those pangs were fleeting. For you, they should be.

Not so for Jim Hood, though, who told Paul:

“It’s a sad day for the judicial system of our state,” said state Attorney General Jim Hood, among those who have benefitted in campaign contributions from Scruggs. “No one wins in such situations, but by these sentences and the earlier convictions, justice has been served. Hopefully, our system has been strengthened, not weakened, and we can move forward to better serve the citizens of Mississippi.”

Sheesh. A sad day for the sentenced and those who love and/or depend on them, yes — but for the judicial system, yesterday brought a cleansing and a restoration (if only the first of many needed). Nobody wins? Who’s this Nobody, Brother Hood? We who depend on the rule of law? Your personal system has surely been weakened — and to the extent it ever had anything to do with standing up for the Little against the Big, yes, that hurts. But by now, some of us are pretty dubious that that was ever its true business.

Charlie Merkel spoke, as is his wont, more sensibly:

Charlie Merkel of Clarksdale, the attorney for Scruggs’ former law partners in lawsuits against Scruggs, said, “The judicial system made an eloquent statement” about what Scruggs did.

Merkel was among those in court when Scruggs was sentenced. He has been fighting Scruggs for 14 years, first representing Alwyn Luckey and now Bob Wilson in a dispute over attorney fees from asbestos litigation.

“Really, any personal feelings or opinion I had couldn’t do anything but detract from what (U.S. District Judge Neal) Biggers said,” Merkel said.

Another touch of class. But since I’m alternating between goods and bads, now it’s time to point out where Jerry Mitchell found Mike Moore:

After the hearing, Moore remarked, “This is tragedy after tragedy after tragedy. Unfortunately, there’s nothing good that comes of this.”

According to Confounded (though I’ve been unable to locate this online), on WLBT “Mike Moore contradicted Biggers and said this was just one isolated incident. Nothing good could come of all this (referring to the sentence I presume).”

What to make of Mike Moore? Does he still think all this criminality made good sense and effective policy? ”Tragedy after tragedy after tragedy” got concocted inside Scruggs Law Firm and, having scarred and stained countless innocents’ lives for years, finally returned to it. If Mike Moore thinks putting a stop to that was “nothing good” . . . well, what do we make of him?

How I’d love it if some reporter/photographer could have snagged Tim Balducci’s, Steve Patterson’s, Joey Langston’s, Ed Peters’, Bobby DeLaughter’s, P.L. Blake’s, Trent Lott’s, and a few others’ reactions as they received the news (more than one person emailed me, “I hope DeLaughter’s reading the blog today”) — but alas, no.

Finally, whether that gang numbered among them I can’t confirm, but our head techie reports that folo had 4,758 different visitors and 42,877 page views yesterday, and the server didn’t blink. Can we say W00T?!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Filed Under: Herald & Examiner

10 Responses so far ↓

  1. Confounded says:

    Okay Jim. That’s it. No way to defend you on that one. I would have thought if you were a law enforcement officer you would be glad the law was enforced. Maybe Acker was right. Maybe you’re just a so called.

  2. lotus says:

    Morning, Confounded. How’s it all look to you today?

  3. Confounded says:

    congrats on the ranking! Great work and community here.

  4. lotus says:

    T’anks, dollin’. I’m so proud of the site’s hanging in there yesterday, I could bust. MAJOR props to riddenword and Alan!

  5. Tim says:

    Kudos for Folo.com. This has been an interesting and informative source during these trying times. Like Judge Biggers I don’t believe its over with. Proof positive if you lay with the dogs you will surely get fleas (no insult dogs intended).

  6. lotus says:

    Thank you too, Tim (it’s folo.US, note). Yezindeedy, plenty mo’ where this came from, no doubt about it.

  7. a friend of the law says:

    I am sensing posturing for the future by the usual suspects and their apologists — a phony feign of remorse —characterization of these prosecutions and sentencing as nothing good for society(even in the sense of righting wrongs and cleaning up a den of crooks), and most importantly, that such is an ISOLATED incident, with an expectation that the other related or similar matters will be swept under the rug. Do these folks, like Mike Moore, know something we don’t? Is there something in the works behind the scenes ($$$$) that will accomplish the above? Eg, pardons for the sentenced? Replacement of currrent US Attys with ones who will not follow up on the current investigations and future prosecutions? IF left to Hood, would anything get done?

    I would like to see federal indictments in the other related and similar matters SOON. Before November. I am getting a bad feeling about the remaining business to be attended to.

  8. MORE COWBELL says:

    The tobacco settlement was the result of McCain, Clinton and Lott. I believe the chances are fair (20 %) that Scruggs is pardoned by President McCain. I believe Scruggs will serve 85 % of sentence (4 years and 3 months).

  9. Observer says:

    Does anyone have a photograph of P.L. Blake that could be posted or linked to?

    What does the man look like?

    And, if you had $50 million in the bank, as it is reported that Blake received $50 million, would you be sitting around waiting on the FBI to knock on your door, or would you have already relocated to a tropical country that has no extradition agreement with the US?

  10. lotus says:

    Observer, you have no idea how hard I’ve searched for a photo of P.L. Blake.