Comments on: Final argument: Liveblogging the Jones v Scruggs hearing part 6 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/ Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:40:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Links-from-the-past– some posts from me about the Scruggs cases | folo http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-28846 Links-from-the-past– some posts from me about the Scruggs cases | folo Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:26:55 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-28846 [...] two), SKG joint venture David Nutt’s testimony, SKG joint venturer Lovelace’s testimony,   closing argument and another post with commentary.  Judge Lackey’s testimony may be the most dramatic I have seen [...] [...] two), SKG joint venture David Nutt’s testimony, SKG joint venturer Lovelace’s testimony,   closing argument and another post with commentary.  Judge Lackey’s testimony may be the most dramatic I have seen [...]

]]> By: injustice4all http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-17391 injustice4all Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:45:03 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-17391 That classic Cal Mayo. Glad to see he hasnt changed much for ours days at Ole Miss. That classic Cal Mayo. Glad to see he hasnt changed much for ours days at Ole Miss.

]]> By: partial coastal http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16978 partial coastal Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:55:02 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16978 Thanks for the summary. Thanks for the summary.

]]> By: crybabyblues http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16966 crybabyblues Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:01:28 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16966 I will try to obtain a copy and scan to post here I will try to obtain a copy and scan to post here

]]> By: crybabyblues http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16965 crybabyblues Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:58:22 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16965 #25 The letter that Barry Hannah wrote to the Editor of the Oxford Eagle, was published earlier last week. Basically said that publicity on the Scruggs had been overwhelming, and everyone makes mistakes and that we should pray for them as well as everyone daily. He spoke of the good that Mr. Scruggs had done for everyone. I searched for it on the website, but they do not store the letters to the editor. I think it was last Tuesday's paper. #25 The letter that Barry Hannah wrote to the Editor of the Oxford Eagle, was published earlier last week. Basically said that publicity on the Scruggs had been overwhelming, and everyone makes mistakes and that we should pray for them as well as everyone daily. He spoke of the good that Mr. Scruggs had done for everyone. I searched for it on the website, but they do not store the letters to the editor. I think it was last Tuesday’s paper.

]]> By: Seacrest http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16963 Seacrest Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:38:51 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16963 Jester You know it. Jester

You know it.

]]> By: NMC http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16962 NMC Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:30:32 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16962 I'm really curious about this, scandaljunkie I’m really curious about this, scandaljunkie

]]> By: scandaljunkie http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16961 scandaljunkie Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:26:50 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16961 I didn't see a letter in today's paper from Barry Hannah. Must have been in a previous paper? I didn’t see a letter in today’s paper from Barry Hannah. Must have been in a previous paper?

]]> By: Justsittinhere http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16959 Justsittinhere Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:00:45 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16959 If Lackey was like a lost ball in high weeds, then what was DeLaughter like when he was approached, a hawg in a sty of warm mud? This entrapment stuff is a load of bull. If a judge is susceptible to a bribe he will name it and ask for it like DeLaughter did. Scruggs learned this from the rodeos before Lackey. Thus wasn't his first rodeo ya know. If Lackey was like a lost ball in high weeds, then what was DeLaughter like when he was approached, a hawg in a sty of warm mud?

This entrapment stuff is a load of bull. If a judge is susceptible to a bribe he will name it and ask for it like DeLaughter did. Scruggs learned this from the rodeos before Lackey. Thus wasn’t his first rodeo ya know.

]]> By: MORE COWBELL http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16958 MORE COWBELL Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:00:49 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/04/15/final-argument-liveblogging-the-jones-v-scruggs-hearing-part-6/#comment-16958 Also, before the ruling in the morning, what did the original partnership agreement say? Nutt @ 35 % was the original figure, I believe. Nothing filled in for the other 4 joint venturers. When shares were voted on at the March 3 meeting, Nutt got only 31 %. What did the others receive Also, before the ruling in the morning, what did the original partnership agreement say? Nutt @ 35 % was the original figure, I believe. Nothing filled in for the other 4 joint venturers. When shares were voted on at the March 3 meeting, Nutt got only 31 %. What did the others receive

]]>