Comments on: Yo, DoJ, folo us to Bobby DeLaughter’s house

By: James Jennings

James Jennings — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:33:44 +0000

Perhaps since Mr Skinner is so prompt to comment on DeLaughter’s current woes he can share with us his take on Houston Patton. After he reads the Bar’s findings and the wonderful work done by the Folo people, of course. I would hate for him to less than informed on the subject.

JailForPatton@Gmail.com

By: lotus

lotus — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:38:56 +0000

Heh, Hot Rod, my Magic 8-Ball says Judge Skinner is immaterial to that question.

By: Hot Rod

Hot Rod — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:21:35 +0000

With Judge Skinner posting here instead of yall politics, does this mean that folo is the hottest blog in the State?

By: kingfish

kingfish — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:49:12 +0000

Just saw the deed of trust. constructioni loan. Although really screwy in a way because most construction loans are NOT for 20 years and ballooning in 20.

HOPEFULLY what he is doing is setting it up as a construction loan and then when done is getting a conforming refinance because its a much better deal for him from what I can tell so far. That would explain why the balloon note.

By: Robert Marie

Robert Marie — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:08:50 +0000

for whatever life i have left i can’t understand why what i have reported and wore-out writing in these comments haven’t been heard. if your an attorney you’ll understand if not i’ll as briefly explain as i can. 1995 bogalusa chemical release was not an accident and attorneys lied about what was released. a disposal attempt in my view failed because their chemical landed on my family’s home. although there were few persons affected attorneys accepted an 84 million dollar settlement on me alone. my wife and were told we would die and not to bother the lawyers. I fired them then got another attorney. so what this next attorney keeps the fraud going. they held a trial with false claims it failed so a known 176 million was all placed on my family and documents show a sought for 2 billion. the failed trial was appealed the appeals court held the ruling on no injuries to others, no matter our compensatory claims were used to gain a punitive action. in 2004 the court made payment to the fraudulent claims attorneys got fees as did the court. we were left for dead but when our symptons stablelized it all hit the fan. we have been attacked by every state agency you can imagine we have been denied any type of aid you can imagine. our exposure left us with life-threatening conditions. our claims went to being settled by judge james graves who refused to release any awards to us they were next held by judge tomie green. we acquired documents in 2004 and demanded release in 2005 judge green transferred the awards to judge bobby delaughter both judges conspired to alter the civil action number. bobby delaughter excepted the awards and turned his back to any and all actions placed before him regarding relief. after stating no one was trying to defraud us he kept the awards and dismissed our claims in late 2007. we have posted documents at photobucket.com login FALCON47_2008 password BUBBA13 this matter has been repeatedly reported to authorities as well as listed within our actions regarding relief. we have posted about 100 documents of the 800 or 900 documents we possess.

By: Justsittinhere

Justsittinhere — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:50:52 +0000

Shaves: believe me when I say I know what Im talking about. Or not. Your choice. Thanks for clearing up the career thing. Later dudes.

By: Steve Eugster

Steve Eugster — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:35:59 +0000

oldmuley is right. It would be interesting, to say the least, to have more information (speculation even) about P.L. Blake, football player and all around guy apparently great fun to be with. And, how about those grain elevators in Texas he is said to have owned at one time? More beautiful than the Kansas grain elevators which were the backdrop for Kim Novak in the movie “Picnic.” But then I digress to another century.

By: shaveswithaoccamsrazor

shaveswithaoccamsrazor — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:57:48 +0000

JSH. No personal offense taken. However to answer your question(s), I changed careers later in life, but I still dabble about a bit. Something a few in the legal profession may be about to do also (smile). Some get in and some get out…

However, I still think that some past personal circumstances and emotions influence you to make un-founded allegations with no corroborating evidence, such as the one I cited above, especially in calling people out by stating, “…that he is a lying, cheating racist who lives in a house no one in the legal profession can understand how a judge could afford…” just to point out one instance I’ve observed where your opinion was stated as “fact.”

But that’s just my opinion and we can agree to disagree on that point and move forward.

DeltaNative. You nailed it. Thanks for the backup: a lil sumptin’ sumptin’ is in the mail for you. LOL

By: Justsittinhere

Justsittinhere — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:31:19 +0000

I couldn’t agree more DN. That was why I was asking.

By: DeltaNative

DeltaNative — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:17:59 +0000

I think shaves’ general point is a good one and is one that I’ve tried to make before, which is: people in this space are exceedingly quick to assume something crooked out of a situation that may or may not be so (granted with some folks who do not seem to deserve the benefit of the doubt). IMHO, leaping to those assumptions without possession of corroborating evidence demeans the value of the comments as an additivite to the editors’ posts and does not add to the discussion. I think that was shaves’ point, and to the extent that was it, I second it.