<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zach Scruggs reply on the 2nd motion to dismiss.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curly</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11061</link>
		<dc:creator>Curly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11061</guid>
		<description>If the Scruggs pair cut a deal it will be on the courthouse steps just before the trial starts.  I could see Backstrom still cutting a deal early though.  Also, I don&#039;t know if the feds really want to cut a deal with Scruggs at this point.  Wouldn&#039;t the benefit of publicly trying him be greater than the cost savings of not trying the case at this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Scruggs pair cut a deal it will be on the courthouse steps just before the trial starts.  I could see Backstrom still cutting a deal early though.  Also, I don&#8217;t know if the feds really want to cut a deal with Scruggs at this point.  Wouldn&#8217;t the benefit of publicly trying him be greater than the cost savings of not trying the case at this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11060</link>
		<dc:creator>My Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11060</guid>
		<description>After reading the post-lunch comment, I also became less confident that it was true... thanks for checking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the post-lunch comment, I also became less confident that it was true&#8230; thanks for checking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotus</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11058</link>
		<dc:creator>lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11058</guid>
		<description>Just spoke with NMC, who&#039;s not finding any substantiation for this rumor and at the moment is leaning against its being likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just spoke with NMC, who&#8217;s not finding any substantiation for this rumor and at the moment is leaning against its being likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magnolia</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11048</link>
		<dc:creator>magnolia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11048</guid>
		<description>Dragoman// Dickie did look like he had visited the local morticion and ask to be made up to look as if he was at death&#039;s door. I personally would not put it past him, win at all cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dragoman// Dickie did look like he had visited the local morticion and ask to be made up to look as if he was at death&#8217;s door. I personally would not put it past him, win at all cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragoman</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11044</guid>
		<description>Mag, that reminds me of the reports of Dickie Scruggs&#039; constant smiling in court a few weeks ago, described by one of our correspondents as &quot;pained,&quot; I believe. 

And the media keep running one photograph of Scruggs in which his smile resembles a death grimace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mag, that reminds me of the reports of Dickie Scruggs&#8217; constant smiling in court a few weeks ago, described by one of our correspondents as &#8220;pained,&#8221; I believe. </p>
<p>And the media keep running one photograph of Scruggs in which his smile resembles a death grimace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magnolia</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11040</link>
		<dc:creator>magnolia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11040</guid>
		<description>Dragoman, The operative word there is smiling. Could be they have something to smile about, as in finding good deal. Don&#039;tha Just Know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dragoman, The operative word there is smiling. Could be they have something to smile about, as in finding good deal. Don&#8217;tha Just Know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragoman</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11039</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11039</guid>
		<description>Interesting, Hotel Kilo Mike. Have they been keeping a low profile lately, or are they often seen out and about in their native habitat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, Hotel Kilo Mike. Have they been keeping a low profile lately, or are they often seen out and about in their native habitat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hkm</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11035</link>
		<dc:creator>hkm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11035</guid>
		<description>I just saw Big Scruggs and Little Scruggs strolling through the Square on their way back from lunch.  If they worked a deal, you sure couldn&#039;t tell it by the wide smiles on their faces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw Big Scruggs and Little Scruggs strolling through the Square on their way back from lunch.  If they worked a deal, you sure couldn&#8217;t tell it by the wide smiles on their faces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NMC</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11032</link>
		<dc:creator>NMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11032</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t get the forward mythoughts, just a short message from Lotus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get the forward mythoughts, just a short message from Lotus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iratetoday</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11028</link>
		<dc:creator>iratetoday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-11028</guid>
		<description>Hood offers help in bribery fiaco

http://www.djournal.com/pages/story.asp?ID=268701&amp;pub=1&amp;div=News

About dang time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hood offers help in bribery fiaco</p>
<p><a href="http://www.djournal.com/pages/story.asp?ID=268701&#038;pub=1&#038;div=News" rel="nofollow">http://www.djournal.com/pages/story.asp?ID=268701&#038;pub=1&#038;div=News</a></p>
<p>About dang time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.folo.us/2008/03/10/zach-scruggs-reply-on-the-2nd-motion-to-dismiss/feed/ ) in 0.32152 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 5:30 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 18th, 2012 at 5:30 am UTC -->
