Comments on: U.S. v. Scruggs: Government responds to the sweet potato motion to dismiss http://www.folo.us/2008/03/06/us-v-scruggs-government-responds-to-the-sweet-potato-motion-to-dismiss/ Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:40:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: a Lurker http://www.folo.us/2008/03/06/us-v-scruggs-government-responds-to-the-sweet-potato-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-10717 a Lurker Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:49:01 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/03/06/us-v-scruggs-government-responds-to-the-sweet-potato-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-10717 I finally found the paper I was looking for. It is in Scruggs supplemental brief on wiretap, Nov. 12, 2007, Exhibit 5. I am not a lawyer so I do not have "link" access to it but you can find it on many of the blogs. Currently, the rage about this is the duo going down to Jackson to see the AG. But, if you look closely the "CHS" is discussing a meeting at the SLF where "RS, ZS..." were present. Unfortunately, I did not quite remember it correctly and using the initials fails when suddenly they start referring to "DS" but ZS was there and there was a good bit of discussion about how to get Judge Lackey to do it their way. Maybe someone else can figure out why the use of initials failed or changed. But, how can Zach claim he was did not know about it when he was there at the launch of the project? I finally found the paper I was looking for. It is in Scruggs supplemental brief on wiretap, Nov. 12, 2007, Exhibit 5. I am not a lawyer so I do not have “link” access to it but you can find it on many of the blogs. Currently, the rage about this is the duo going down to Jackson to see the AG. But, if you look closely the “CHS” is discussing a meeting at the SLF where “RS, ZS…” were present. Unfortunately, I did not quite remember it correctly and using the initials fails when suddenly they start referring to “DS” but ZS was there and there was a good bit of discussion about how to get Judge Lackey to do it their way. Maybe someone else can figure out why the use of initials failed or changed. But, how can Zach claim he was did not know about it when he was there at the launch of the project?

]]> By: Seacrest http://www.folo.us/2008/03/06/us-v-scruggs-government-responds-to-the-sweet-potato-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-10502 Seacrest Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:45:49 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/03/06/us-v-scruggs-government-responds-to-the-sweet-potato-motion-to-dismiss/#comment-10502 I like "While Balducci described this additional payment as "sweet potatoes, " nobody seriously contends they believed Balducci was taking potatoes to Calhoun City. " I like

“While Balducci described this additional payment as "sweet potatoes, " nobody seriously contends they believed Balducci was taking potatoes to Calhoun City. “

]]>