folo

folo header image 2

MS House whomps up on judge-bribers

February 29th, 2008 @ 7:52 am - by lotus · 6 Comments

Hat-tip to Alan Lange for this story from Columbus’s Commercial-Dispatch:

House OKs harsher penalty for judge bribes

JACKSON – The Mississippi House on Tuesday adopted a proposal by Rep. Gary Chism of Columbus to impose stiffer penalties for bribing judges.

The House of Representatives took up the bill to make bribing a judge a violation of the state’s obstruction-of-justice law.

Chism got the House to adopt an amendment increasing the bill’s original penalty. It goes up to five-to-20 years in prison and a fine of at least $25,000 or three times the amount of the bribe.

The bill had said the punishment should be not more than five years in jail and a $5,000 fine. …

"I think somebody who bribes a judge,” Republican Chism allows, “should get something more severe than that, " while House Judiciary "A " Committee Chairman Ed Blackmon, D-Canton, noting that the bill was inspired by Mississippi’s current judicial scandals, puts in, "This certainly sends the message: if you want to bribe a judge, you’re in big trouble if you get caught. "

With the measure headed to Senate consideration, any predictions on how it fares there (or when either house might get serious about fining Sunshine-law-breakers more than $100 a pop)?

Tags:
Filed Under: Herald & Examiner

6 Responses so far ↓

  1. a friend of the law says:

    I think the fine should be 3 times the amount of the bribe OR 3 times the amount of money seeking to be saved by making the bribe, whichever is larger. And IF the bribe involves a member of the MS Bar (atty, Judge, or both), permanent disbarment and removal from the bench.

    Its a step in the right direction, but still not enough IMO.

  2. lotus says:

    Ooo yeah, I like your ideas waaaay better, afotl. Those would get good attention pronto.

  3. a friend of the law says:

    Even better, if there are multiple offenses, then double the fines and jail times, and add an hour of waterboarding.

  4. confounded says:

    what about penalizing the judge? why isn’t there any provision in the bill for that?

  5. My Thoughts says:

    Senate will pass

  6. Dixie K. Blankley says:

    It will pass, but will it ever be acted upon?