If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to the Folo RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
UPDATE: I posted a mistake here. The judge took the motion to sever under advisement.
The motion for a change of venue was denied. More later.
Please support folo
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to the Folo RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
UPDATE: I posted a mistake here. The judge took the motion to sever under advisement.
The motion for a change of venue was denied. More later.
Filed Under: Herald & Examiner
© 2006–2010 folo — Sitemap
Soooo, this leaves us with… wiretaps? Is that the only thing still left on the table?
I believe that he has not ruled on the other crimes or the warrants. I think both are under advisement. Wanted more info from both sides to be submitted Monday as I recall.
Daily Journal has this quote regarding Biggers on venue:
“He said while it has presented probably the most thorough briefing he’d ever read, there was not any information in there that indicated to him how many people may have been influenced or have read any of these stories about the case in the state or the region.”
Hmm, MT 3.
See, Keker, we tol’ ya — we ARE chopped livah!
I just posted details from the hearing
Yes yes … Bloggers Unite!
Hey Tom: remember the “we could send delaughter a memorandum on a paper napkin e-mail?” there’s a link to Zach!
confounded, I was really surprised the government didn’t mention that.