Comments on: US v. Scruggs hearings begin- Lawyers argue over whether to hear witnesses http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/ Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:40:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: mslawyer http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8457 mslawyer Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:43:34 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8457 Oh I am sorry, it definitely isn't rude to make such crass and sarcastic remarks about some one you obviously do not know. Definitely my bad. But sires, by cause I am a burel man, At my bigynnyng first I yow biseche, Have me excused of my rude speche. I lerned nevere rethorik, certeyn; Thyng that I speke, it moot be bare and pleyn. Oh I am sorry, it definitely isn’t rude to make such crass and sarcastic remarks about some one you obviously do not know. Definitely my bad.

But sires, by cause I am a burel man,
At my bigynnyng first I yow biseche,
Have me excused of my rude speche.
I lerned nevere rethorik, certeyn;
Thyng that I speke, it moot be bare and pleyn.

]]> By: MSlawyer http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8437 MSlawyer Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:51:51 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8437 It doesn't matter to me at all -- just wanted to make sure you and Jane knew that wasn't me in the no. 11 post on this thread ('cause I feared it would be considered somewhat, ahem, rude -- after all, Jane doesn't ramble and I enjoy reading her commentary). It doesn’t matter to me at all — just wanted to make sure you and Jane knew that wasn’t me in the no. 11 post on this thread (’cause I feared it would be considered somewhat, ahem, rude — after all, Jane doesn’t ramble and I enjoy reading her commentary).

]]> By: lotus http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8433 lotus Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:37:00 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8433 I know you're not, MSlawyer (your MS is uppercase, his isn't). I really think it's his obligation to change handles -- your claim on it was first-in-time -- but if you want to, feel free. I know you’re not, MSlawyer (your MS is uppercase, his isn’t). I really think it’s his obligation to change handles — your claim on it was first-in-time — but if you want to, feel free.

]]> By: MSlawyer http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8430 MSlawyer Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:31:31 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8430 Jane and lotus -- I am not mslawyer 11. Just wanted to clarify. lotus -- should I change my name? Happy to do so to avoid confusion. Jane and lotus — I am not mslawyer 11. Just wanted to clarify. lotus — should I change my name? Happy to do so to avoid confusion.

]]> By: lotus http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8418 lotus Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:13:28 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8418 Don't you DARE mess-over the Wyf, Miss Jane, or it's all over between us! I <em>luff</em> <del>that gap-toothed ol' broad</del> Dame Alysoun! Don’t you DARE mess-over the Wyf, Miss Jane, or it’s all over between us!

I luff that gap-toothed ol’ broad Dame Alysoun!

]]> By: NMC http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8416 NMC Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:11:41 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8416 I've a short post up-- about to put up more I’ve a short post up– about to put up more

]]> By: Dragoman http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8415 Dragoman Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:09:47 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8415 Well, that's one way to go through life, I guess. Well, that’s one way to go through life, I guess.

]]> By: mslawyer http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8413 mslawyer Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:08:47 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8413 Jane #8 - What the heck are you rambling about? Jane #8 – What the heck are you rambling about?

]]> By: Dragoman http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8411 Dragoman Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:02:59 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8411 I know Bobs Wilson was a big bibliophile. He used to hang out a lot at Choctaw Books here in Jackson. Didn't know he was a Chaucer nut, though. I know Bobs Wilson was a big bibliophile. He used to hang out a lot at Choctaw Books here in Jackson. Didn’t know he was a Chaucer nut, though.

]]> By: Dragoman http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8409 Dragoman Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:56:09 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/20/morning-hearings-part-1-lawyers-argue-over-whether-to-hear-witnesses/#comment-8409 I've heard "Bobs" here locally, too, somslawyer. I’ve heard “Bobs” here locally, too, somslawyer.

]]>