folo

folo header image 2

"The Secret State ": Day Eight, Part 2

February 18th, 2008 @ 8:45 am - by lotus · 3 Comments

It falls to William Browning of the Greenwood Commonwealth to channel the call of the GOB in closing (anti-reform) argument with Officials say secrecy sometimes needed in government affairs.

GREENWOOD — A man calls the police after he thinks he hears a woman screaming next door. He tells the dispatcher he thinks his neighbor’s wife is being beaten.

Police show up to find children simply roughhousing and screaming in the backyard, but by law they file an incident report. The local newspaper obtains the report, runs a story about the incident and the man at the house gets falsely accused of being a wife-beater by his community.

A major manufacturer is planning to build a new facility in an economically depressed region. The region’s newspaper reports the possibility, and soon local politicians are bombarding the company with promises and requests. The manufacturer – which could have brought 400 jobs to the area – decides to move to another state where it is better able to control the flow of information.

These are just two scenarios that defenders of exemptions in Mississippi’s sunshine laws cite as reasons to limit public access to some information.

Browning interviews Trey Bobinger, a lobbyist for the Mississippi Sheriffs Association, who says,

“These incident reports are delicate territory. And while the media absolutely has a responsibility to the public to let them know what’s going on, I don’t think anyone in the public is saying, ‘I want to know what’s going on even if it prohibits law enforcement from catching criminals.’ “

Bobinger thinks calls to make incident reports public are overblown, that the current level of information-release to media across the state “has not been a problem,” and that sheriffs generally have “very good” relationships with local media. “I’m not saying there hasn’t been problems in the past, but when they do pop up, they’re isolated.”

He just doesn’t see any reason for the press to, um, press: “During meetings on the subject, both sides can usually agree that there is not a huge problem. That being said, if the law as it stands is not causing any widespread problems, why the push to change it?”

Echoing Bobinger’s lahdidah is David Rumbarger, president and CEO of Tupelo’s Community Development Foundation, whom Browning identifies as “instrumental” in helping Tupelo land a Toyota plant last year.

Toyota expects to employ 2,000 at the factory, ultimately paying $20 an hour in an area that has been hit hard by the loss of furniture manufacturing.

When its search began, Toyota let it be known up front, Rumbarger said, that it hoped economic development representatives and civic leaders would respect its confidentiality.

“That was nothing surprising or new,” Rumbarger said. “These guys, these industries, they like to make their decisions without the pressure of politicians, but also without the pressure of the public. They’re private organizations whose goal at the end of the day is to improve their bottom line.”

Interestingly, Rumbarger claims that he went to the Daily Journal “early on” to ask that the local paper respect Toyota’s confidentiality in its reporting. “And they respected that request.”

But this apparently comes as a surprise to DJ editor Lloyd Gray, who tells Browning, “They may be giving us credit for knowing more than we did.”

“We had nothing definitive about Toyota coming to the area,” Gray said in explaining the paper’s coverage. “But I can say we didn’t do a lot of speculative reporting.”

Although Gray said he had no specific conversation with Rumbarger about the need for secrecy, “we are not in the business of sabotaging these type of things intentionally.”

Rumbarger thinks that the Tennessee and Arkansas towns that Toyota also considered “got caught up in the hype,” while Mississippi and Tupelo “kinda kept their heads low. And we were able to land these guys while those other places didn’t.”

So there you have it: the last installment of “Mississippi: The Secret State.” I’ll give my own response to the series next, but since these stories will quickly disappear behind firewalls it takes ridiculous determination, not to mention fees, to surmount, I wanted to stash their jists here where you’ll be able to find them anytime you like, easily and for free.

GOBs just hate that kind of thang, you know . . .

Tags:
Filed Under: Herald & Examiner

3 Responses so far ↓

  1. a friend of the law says:

    Please allow me to just say exactly what needs to be said about those “reasons” that we need secrecy in state governmental functions : Bullshit!!

    If the Toyota development was supposed to be a closely guarded state secret, then those trying to keep it secret failed miserably. Many business folks and others who stay informed of things were talking about it well before the first annoucement of it ever hit the paper —- months in advance. There were so many governmental agencies and politicians involved in Toyota coming to MS, that it was impossible to keep it a secret. The more folks who know about it, the less likely the ability to keep it secret.

    You had the 3 county alliance (Pontotoc, Union, and Lee) called the PUL alliance. You had 3 Rivers Planning and Development. You had our state representatives and senators in the North MS area. You had our MS congressional delegation of representatives and senators. The Governor and Lt. Gov. were involved. And, of course, there was CDF, comprised of business persons from Lee County, MS and beyond. And I am probably leaving out many players in the deal.

    That is a lot of potential loose lips. I knew about it well in advance, and I’m not even part of the GOB network.

    And here we have, once again, CDF taking much more credit for this development than it could possibly deserve with all of these other agencies being the key players in the deal.

    To say that the needed secresy was to prevent politicians from calling Toyota, or otherwise bothering them, is laughable when you consider how many local politicians knew about it and were directly involved in it. Ok, ….for arguments sake, lets say that the county dog catchers, constables, and coroners were not in the loop. But, would they really be so excited about this development to be calling and pestering Toyota? About what?

    The other bit from the guy in the Delta is pretty lame as well. Reporting or not reporting incident reports and other such information is a judgement call by the media, which must be careful not to report something in such a way as to mislead or print false information about a private citizen, particularly one who is not a public figure. Failure to do such can lead to the newspaper getting sued for libel. Is this type of bad reporting really a problem? Or an imagined boogeyman used to support the status quo?

  2. lotus says:

    Stupid blog just ate my comment, which was:

    No kidding, afotl, none of the three — Browning, Bobinger, or Rumbarger — even half tried for a convincing argument. But hey, always worked before.

  3. jason says:

    Wonder when they will try to come out with an argument?