While we salivate for NMC’s next installment of his bribery-case narrative, I’ll pass along something intriguing that op99 shared with me: a post at TheAgitator.com asking Did Bill Sink Hill on Purpose?
This analysis suggests that Big Dawg’s comments on Barack Obama-as-Jesse Jackson were the tipping point that pushed Camp HRC into the tailspin from which we don’t (and probably won’t) see it recovering. Not only that, but The Agitator speculates that this mess-making was (subconsciously) intentional.
I find the argument quite plausible, even persuasive. Here’s its “nut graf”:
They don’t come much more alpha male than Bill Clinton. The guy’s a walking er*ction. I can’t imagine anything more emasculating to an alpha-alpha like Bill than to watch his wife arc over him …for her to become more powerful than he. Actually, it’s quite a bit worse than that. Hillary Clinton was on the verge of not only becoming more powerful than Bill, she was ready to become the most powerful person on the planet. Not only that, she was about to do so by assuming the very office Bill once held, but (probably) won’t ever hold again. Bill, on the other hand, would be relegated to first lady. I can’t see how that wouldn’t mess with the psychology of a guy like Clinton.
Give it a look and a think if you’ve got time. I’m interested to hear what y’all make of it.
Interesting piece at theagitator; makes some sense to me. Moreover, she’ll have to find him some kind of big as* job to keep him from trying to run things if she’s elected. Don’t buy the arguments about the McCain statements though (it will be the friendliest campaign …) I think voters are really sick of the nastiness, and he was offering that as another reason to support her. I know I’m sick of it. I’m an Obama girl (well old woman) myself and hate to think about the kind of crap the dirty tricksters are going to pull out of their as*** if he’s the nominee.
Oops, you said er*ction. Wait’ll you see your spam after that!
The Agitator’s premise sounds plausible to me, with heavy emphasis on “subconsciously.”
BTW, here’s where I found the link to the Agitator.
Um-hm, ducky, but his rhetorical problem there is that Camp Clinton’s been the source of all nastiness in the Dem race so far. Little cognitive dissonance there, Bill?
Woops, op, scuze me, gotta go edit sumpin rill fast!
Bill is all about power and would rather be in the White House again than sabotage her. They are truly a political couple. His need for power drives everything else in his life.
I enjoyed the article. The linked site led me to other areas of Clintonia of which I was previously unaware. I found there is a large conspiracy industry re. Bill and the deaths of his acquaintances. I suspect if you look deep enough you can find a conspiracy theory on any subject. It did make for interesting reading. Here is a link to a list of 46 departed soles who knew Bill and Hill.
http://www.zpub.com/un/un-bc-body.html
[Edited by site owner for the sake of maintaining the credibility of this blog.]
Without getting into the “who killed Vince Foster” theories (I’ve got plenty other reasons to vote against HRC), I’ve been to Fort Marcy Park and it looked like as good a place to die as any…better than most, as it’s remote, quiet and yet readily accessible.
I think it’s “thinking” of the sort that is displayed in that article that has gotten us Hillary Clinton and a snake oil salesman as the last two candidates standing.
Wake me up when this country is sane again.
As long as we are being somewhat political here, while waiting for the Grand Jury to name more names, I have a question. I would like to preface the question by stating that Ron Paul, in my opinion, is pretty far outside the realm of present day reality. (So there is my don’t stone me for mentioning Ron Paul defense.) Here goes… How many bases and how many soldiers are there outside of the US? What is the annual cost of these bases?
Hey Lotus, the embolden feature worked.
Maybe Bill wants Hill finally to divorce him.
Putin on Hillary: “At a minimum, a head of state should have a head.”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Putin_vs_Clinton.html