Comments on: Remember that Molly Ivins video? http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/ Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:40:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Anderson http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7217 Anderson Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:45:37 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7217 N.b. that the 5th Circuit reads Carey v. Population Services correctly, unlike the Miss. Supreme Court in its dunderheaded opinion upholding the sex-toy ban. Here's hoping someone goes to Miss. district court with the present op in hand. PHE, Inc., plaintiff-intervenor in the 5th Circuit case, was the appellant in the Miss. state case. OTOH, look for this one to go en banc -- Barksdale may prevail yet. Presumably, a West Point grad can give his lady an orgasm without any of those silly gadgets. N.b. that the 5th Circuit reads Carey v. Population Services correctly, unlike the Miss. Supreme Court in its dunderheaded opinion upholding the sex-toy ban.

Here’s hoping someone goes to Miss. district court with the present op in hand. PHE, Inc., plaintiff-intervenor in the 5th Circuit case, was the appellant in the Miss. state case.

OTOH, look for this one to go en banc — Barksdale may prevail yet. Presumably, a West Point grad can give his lady an orgasm without any of those silly gadgets.

]]> By: jason http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7206 jason Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:55:54 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7206 Lotus, as a new comer I wondered where that was going to go. HA Lotus, as a new comer I wondered where that was going to go. HA

]]> By: Researcher http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7197 Researcher Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:15:57 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7197 I knew that. I was wondering why this content triggered a Coulter ad. Then I got a Newt Gingrich ad. Never mind. I don't want to know how the Google's software works. I knew that. I was wondering why this content triggered a Coulter ad. Then I got a Newt Gingrich ad. Never mind. I don’t want to know how the Google’s software works.

]]> By: NMC http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7190 NMC Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:58:24 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7190 Lotus in 8: You aren't going to be able to print that ND Alabama opinion without censoring it I don't think. Researcher in 9: Because those are the advertisements that Google delivers to Folo. Lotus in 8:

You aren’t going to be able to print that ND Alabama opinion without censoring it I don’t think.

Researcher in 9:

Because those are the advertisements that Google delivers to Folo.

]]> By: Researcher http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7185 Researcher Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:27:47 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7185 Why am I getting an ad for a weekly email from Ann Coulter? Why am I getting an ad for a weekly email from Ann Coulter?

]]> By: lotus http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7183 lotus Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:20:07 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7183 NMC 6! Mind yer spelling on here or lawd knows what we git next! I just heard from a major MS law firm that their ISP was blocking this site "due to [objectionable] content." Now I figured that might mean "objectionable to some friend of Dickie's," but let us be keerful. P.S. Talk about mos' any ol' thing here, but camouflage your spelling of <i>some</i> spam-attracting things, okay, everybody? NMC 6! Mind yer spelling on here or lawd knows what we git next!

I just heard from a major MS law firm that their ISP was blocking this site “due to [objectionable] content.” Now I figured that might mean “objectionable to some friend of Dickie’s,” but let us be keerful.

P.S. Talk about mos’ any ol’ thing here, but camouflage your spelling of some spam-attracting things, okay, everybody?

]]> By: watching closely http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7181 watching closely Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:11:29 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7181 The Alabama District Court reversed the ban as I recall and then the 11th Circuit reversed and remanded in part. I read somewhere that the Supremes were thinking about looking at the Constitutionality of such laws. The Alabama District Court reversed the ban as I recall and then the 11th Circuit reversed and remanded in part. I read somewhere that the Supremes were thinking about looking at the Constitutionality of such laws.

]]> By: NMC http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7180 NMC Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:05:45 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7180 The north Alabama district court opinion overturning the Alabama statute (an opinion that is online somewhere) is hilarious-- has a long history of d*ldoes going back to the Victorians. The north Alabama district court opinion overturning the Alabama statute (an opinion that is online somewhere) is hilarious– has a long history of d*ldoes going back to the Victorians.

]]> By: jason http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7179 jason Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:50:19 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7179 That will really be interesting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That will really be interesting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: Jane http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7175 Jane Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:25:45 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/13/remember-that-molly-ivins-video/#comment-7175 Yeah - useful ones! Yeah – useful ones!

]]>