Comments on: Two comments on the motion to dismiss for outrageous misconduct. http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/ Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:40:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: NMC http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7089 NMC Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:39:40 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7089 the 19th, MSLawyer. the 19th, MSLawyer.

]]> By: MSlawyer http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7084 MSlawyer Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:30:40 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7084 Wonder when the gov. response is due? Wonder when the gov. response is due?

]]> By: Its All Good http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7083 Its All Good Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:29:30 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7083 Judge sets hearing on pre-trial motions 2/12/2008 7:21:10 PM Daily Journal OXFORD ... Senior Judge Neal Biggers Jr. will hear seven pre-trial motions Feb. 20 in the government's judicial bribery case against famed Oxford litigator Richard "Dickie " Scruggs, his attorney son Zach and their legal associate Sidney Backstrom. The hearing is set to begin at 9 a.m. in the U.S. District Court in Oxford. According to the order setting the motions for hearing, posted Tuesday, Biggers will consider the defense motions: 1. To dismiss the indictment for reason of outrageous government conduct. 2. To dismiss Counts 2, 3 & 4 of the indictment for alleged lack of jurisdiction. 3. To suppress wiretap info and search warrant results. 4. To exclude evidence offered by the government pursuant to Rule 404(b), about prior bad acts. 5. Of Zachary Scruggs to sever his trial from that of Richard Scruggs. 6. Of Sidney A. Backstrom to sever his trial from that of Richard Scruggs. 7. Of all defendants for a change of venue. http://www.djournal.com/pages/story.asp?ID=265789&pub=1&div=News Judge sets hearing on pre-trial motions
2/12/2008 7:21:10 PM
Daily Journal

OXFORD … Senior Judge Neal Biggers Jr. will hear seven pre-trial motions Feb. 20 in the government’s judicial bribery case against famed Oxford litigator Richard "Dickie " Scruggs, his attorney son Zach and their legal associate Sidney Backstrom.

The hearing is set to begin at 9 a.m. in the U.S. District Court in Oxford.

According to the order setting the motions for hearing, posted Tuesday, Biggers will consider the defense motions:

1. To dismiss the indictment for reason of outrageous government conduct.

2. To dismiss Counts 2, 3 & 4 of the indictment for alleged lack of jurisdiction.

3. To suppress wiretap info and search warrant results.

4. To exclude evidence offered by the government pursuant to Rule 404(b), about prior bad acts.

5. Of Zachary Scruggs to sever his trial from that of Richard Scruggs.

6. Of Sidney A. Backstrom to sever his trial from that of Richard Scruggs.

7. Of all defendants for a change of venue.

http://www.djournal.com/pages/story.asp?ID=265789&pub=1&div=News

]]> By: lotus http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7031 lotus Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:26:36 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7031 mag, that wasn't Judge Biggers' but the prosecutors' evaluation, that "not very complicated" or "straightforward and uncomplicated" or whatever the exact phrasing was. mag, that wasn’t Judge Biggers’ but the prosecutors’ evaluation, that “not very complicated” or “straightforward and uncomplicated” or whatever the exact phrasing was.

]]> By: magnolia http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7022 magnolia Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:18:44 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7022 NMC, What was Judge Biggers comments on this crime not being to complicated..Or something to that effect., I believe that was on th efirst motion to extend. NMC, What was Judge Biggers comments on this crime not being to complicated..Or something to that effect., I believe that was on th efirst motion to extend.

]]> By: Lost http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7019 Lost Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:56:43 +0000 http://www.folo.us/2008/02/12/two-comments-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-for-outrageous-misconduct/#comment-7019 Based on the motion, TB had a long standing relationship with Judge Lackey- which goes to prove that TB knew exactly what he was doing or he is dumber than a rock. Anyone who really knows Judge Lackey would know that it is laughable that Judge Lackey would need $40K to get over a little hump. Judge Lackey is very astute - in business and in evaluating people. Based on the motion, TB had a long standing relationship with Judge Lackey- which goes to prove that TB knew exactly what he was doing or he is dumber than a rock. Anyone who really knows Judge Lackey would know that it is laughable that Judge Lackey would need $40K to get over a little hump. Judge Lackey is very astute – in business and in evaluating people.

]]>