<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shelton, Part 1: the Bar tribunal&#8217;s findings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.folo.us/2008/02/04/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/02/04/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lotus</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/02/04/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5315</link>
		<dc:creator>lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5315</guid>
		<description>JAMES -- WOOHOO!

Welcome to folo, and jump &quot;upstairs&quot; with me for the new post and a fresh pot o&#039; cawfee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JAMES &#8212; WOOHOO!</p>
<p>Welcome to folo, and jump &#8220;upstairs&#8221; with me for the new post and a fresh pot o&#8217; cawfee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/02/04/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5314</link>
		<dc:creator>James Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5314</guid>
		<description>To clarify that 2nd sentence...Patton being the incompetent boob,not Shelton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify that 2nd sentence&#8230;Patton being the incompetent boob,not Shelton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/02/04/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5313</link>
		<dc:creator>James Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5313</guid>
		<description>Jane, Shelton met with Patton as a courtesy. Having already had dealings with this incompetent boob, I made him carry a wire. We also recorded all telephone calls. Patton stated to Shelton if I correct recall, that he believed he had done no wrong. At that juncture, Shelton and I started drafting the pleadings for the 42-1983 suit. TWO DAYS later, Patton called Shelton and told him he wanted to settle. I unplugged the phone, told Shelton to tell him he got disconnected and to RECORD ALL CALLS. He and Shelton spent two days drafting the release and settle agreement. Which by the way.....I think I&#039;m about to have collected.

Poor Shelton...We could not believe we got arrested. They flung us in a concrete cell that was about 55 degrees so it was literally too cold to sleep. About 3:00 AM Shelton laughed and stated,&quot; You know I&#039;m billing you by the hour for this&quot;. We had a good laugh over that one. I wish I could name names at this point but I&#039;ll tell you this, two of the jailers at Hinds County would be made saints had I any influence with the Vatican.


I have questions about the integrity of Brant Brantley. Surely the citizens of Mississippi deserve better? I damn well know I do! I think it&#039;s time he looks for another job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane, Shelton met with Patton as a courtesy. Having already had dealings with this incompetent boob, I made him carry a wire. We also recorded all telephone calls. Patton stated to Shelton if I correct recall, that he believed he had done no wrong. At that juncture, Shelton and I started drafting the pleadings for the 42-1983 suit. TWO DAYS later, Patton called Shelton and told him he wanted to settle. I unplugged the phone, told Shelton to tell him he got disconnected and to RECORD ALL CALLS. He and Shelton spent two days drafting the release and settle agreement. Which by the way&#8230;..I think I&#8217;m about to have collected.</p>
<p>Poor Shelton&#8230;We could not believe we got arrested. They flung us in a concrete cell that was about 55 degrees so it was literally too cold to sleep. About 3:00 AM Shelton laughed and stated,&#8221; You know I&#8217;m billing you by the hour for this&#8221;. We had a good laugh over that one. I wish I could name names at this point but I&#8217;ll tell you this, two of the jailers at Hinds County would be made saints had I any influence with the Vatican.</p>
<p>I have questions about the integrity of Brant Brantley. Surely the citizens of Mississippi deserve better? I damn well know I do! I think it&#8217;s time he looks for another job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/02/04/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5312</link>
		<dc:creator>James Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5312</guid>
		<description>Please note...the style of the Justice Court case referenced above is a CIVIL STYLING...&quot;Kenney v. Jennings&quot;, not a criminal case. And yes, Ray Bates is a corrupt maggot of a man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note&#8230;the style of the Justice Court case referenced above is a CIVIL STYLING&#8230;&#8221;Kenney v. Jennings&#8221;, not a criminal case. And yes, Ray Bates is a corrupt maggot of a man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingfish</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2008/02/04/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5310</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/shelton-part-1-the-bar-tribunals-findings/#comment-5310</guid>
		<description>WOW!!!

So much for due process.

So why was no Section 1983 suit filed? Layman&#039;s question. Or does it not apply to judicial officers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!!</p>
<p>So much for due process.</p>
<p>So why was no Section 1983 suit filed? Layman&#8217;s question. Or does it not apply to judicial officers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
