<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sen. Trent Lott scarpers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lotus</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Memphis, thanks again for that link, which I finally just got read. Now I at least partially see why the Jones firm isn&#039;t in the same ethics trouble as rest of the SKG&gt;KLG crowd.   Next I want to check on anything Rossmiller&#039;s explained about when Dickie first introduced (either personally or verbally) the Rigsbys to Jones, Funderburg and the rest of SKG.

Now to review that earlier Rigsbys-SKG period, if I can find it over at David&#039;s . . .  meanwhile, I think you and I have never actually disagreed about the overall issue. We can both be right: No lawyer who knowingly signs off on bribing witnesses (with or without calling them &quot;litigation consultants&quot;) IS fit for a Bar card -- BUT -- according to that motion of yours, Jones, Funderburg DIDN&#039;T have that kind of knowledge.

But I still want to find more of the Rigsby-SKG history to settle my mind about it definitively. Thanks for your help with that project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memphis, thanks again for that link, which I finally just got read. Now I at least partially see why the Jones firm isn&#8217;t in the same ethics trouble as rest of the SKG&gt;KLG crowd.   Next I want to check on anything Rossmiller&#8217;s explained about when Dickie first introduced (either personally or verbally) the Rigsbys to Jones, Funderburg and the rest of SKG.</p>
<p>Now to review that earlier Rigsbys-SKG period, if I can find it over at David&#8217;s . . .  meanwhile, I think you and I have never actually disagreed about the overall issue. We can both be right: No lawyer who knowingly signs off on bribing witnesses (with or without calling them &#8220;litigation consultants&#8221;) IS fit for a Bar card &#8212; BUT &#8212; according to that motion of yours, Jones, Funderburg DIDN&#8217;T have that kind of knowledge.</p>
<p>But I still want to find more of the Rigsby-SKG history to settle my mind about it definitively. Thanks for your help with that project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotus</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-938</guid>
		<description>Right backatcha, Dru!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right backatcha, Dru!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dru</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-937</guid>
		<description>Exxxcellent. Nice looking place. Glad to see you again, flowah. Bookmark placed. Happy holidays!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exxxcellent. Nice looking place. Glad to see you again, flowah. Bookmark placed. Happy holidays!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotus</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-936</guid>
		<description>&#039;Tis indeed, Dru. Welcome to my li&#039;l ol&#039; place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Tis indeed, Dru. Welcome to my li&#8217;l ol&#8217; place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dru</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Is this the formerly early morning FDL lotus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the formerly early morning FDL lotus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memphis</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Memphis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Also look starting at page 8 in the link above &quot;here&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also look starting at page 8 in the link above &#8220;here&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotus</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Memphis, I just started that brief and didn&#039;t see you here offering it. Be back when I&#039;ve read it . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Memphis, I just started that brief and didn&#8217;t see you here offering it. Be back when I&#8217;ve read it . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memphis</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Memphis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Jones/Funderburg didnt know Rigsbys were getting paid until Jan 07 which was right before they got kicked out then filed suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jones/Funderburg didnt know Rigsbys were getting paid until Jan 07 which was right before they got kicked out then filed suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memphis</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Memphis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-930</guid>
		<description>sorry starting page 42</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry starting page 42</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memphis</title>
		<link>http://www.folo.us/2007/12/19/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Memphis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folo.us/uncategorized/sen-trent-lott-scarpers/#comment-928</guid>
		<description>Lotus you might wanna read this before you draw that conclusion.
Check starting on page 47 of the plaintiff supplemental brief on Rossmillers site.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insurancecoverageblog.com/Jones%20v.%20Scruggs%20plaintiff&#039;s%20supplemental%20response.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Click Here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lotus you might wanna read this before you draw that conclusion.<br />
Check starting on page 47 of the plaintiff supplemental brief on Rossmillers site.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.insurancecoverageblog.com/Jones%20v.%20Scruggs%20plaintiff's%20supplemental%20response.pdf" rel="nofollow">Click Here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
